Site icon

#ME TOO Movement In India- Sexual Harassment At Workplace

#ME TOO Movement In India- Sexual Harassment At Workplace

#ME TOO Movement In India- Sexual Harassment At Workplace

 

The Me Too Movement in India is an outburst which is influenced by the prevailing international campaign against issues of sexual harassment in the workplace.

The movement started in the Malayalam film industry through an effort to protect the rights of the female artist from sexual assaults. The gaining international popularity of the movement has increased its momentum in India following the sexual harassment case in Bollywood between actress Tanushree Dutta and Nana Patekar. The aftermath of this has caused many Indian women in the government, news media and film sectors to open on their experiences on sexual harassment with men.

The Me Too Movement which is also tagged #MeToo is a struggle to end all forms of sexual assault and sexual harassment. The movement became more popular in October 2017 on social media via a hashtag that voices out against the prevalence of sexual harassment and sexual assault in the workplace.

 

WHAT ARE THE LAWS ON SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN INDIA?

Section 354A of the Indian Penal Code defines sexual harassment as an unacceptable physical contact and advances which include an unwanted sexual demand, sexual overtures, request for sex, making unwanted sexual remarks and showing of pornographic images of someone without the person’s consent. The law prescribes a punishment of three years imprisonment with a fine.

Section 354B prescribes a 3-years imprisonment and a fine for the offense of forcing a woman to undress.

Watching or taking nude pictures of a woman without her approval is a criminal offense as prescribed in Section 354C of the Indian Penal Code. The first conviction attracts 3 years imprisonment and a fine while the second conviction or more attract a jail term of 3 to 7 years with a fine.

Section D criminalizes the act of following or trying to contact a woman despite her persistent refusal of the contact and the act of monitoring a woman by using an electronic means of communication or the internet without her consent. The first conviction attracts a prison term of 3 years and a fine while more than one conviction is punished with 3 – 5 years’ imprisonment and a fine.

Insult against the modesty of a woman by making sounds or saying words that intrudes into her privacy is criminalized under 13 Section 509 of the IPC. This offense is punished with 3 years’ imprisonment and a fine.

Section 1 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act criminalizes the act of showing the body part of a child or exhibiting the child’s body or making attempts at creating sexual images of a child. Offenders is to serve a 3 years’ imprisonment with a fine.

 

WHAT ARE THE MAIN FEATURES OF THE SEXUAL HARASSMENT OF WOMEN AT WORKPLACE (PREVENTION, PROHIBITION, AND REDRESSAL) ACT 2013?

  1. Sexual harassment at the workplace is defined in the Act and creates a mechanism for redress and equally prohibits malicious charges.
  2. Concepts of a hostile work environment as forms of sexual harassment is featured in the Act.
  3. An aggrieved woman has been widely defined to cover all women irrespective of status and age in the society.
  4. The definition of an employer is covered in the Act.
  5. The Act covers students in colleges, patients in hospitals and employers will inaugurate committees to investigate complaints made by the aggrieved. Any employer or local authority that defaults in this regard will be punished with a fine of Rs. 50000.
  6. The complaint committee has the power to gather evidence just like the civil court.
  7. The complaint committee must complete its inquiry within 90 days of commencement of the investigation.
  8. Employers are to sensitize its employers on sexual harassment and make the necessary policies that will limit its occurrence at the workplace.
  9. Each branch of the workplace with 10 employees must constitute a complaint committee.

 

MOST OF THE RECENT SEXUAL HARASSMENT CASES IN INDIA THAT BECAME TOP MEDIA HIGHLIGHTS 

Below are some of the most important sexual harassment cases in India.

Tanushree Dutta & Nana Patekar Case- 

Dutta’s declaration is regarded as the pillar for the sustenance of the Me Too movement in India. It is believed that more and more women will be now come up to declare their feelings against incidents of sexual harassments and more high-profile individuals in the entertainment industry who are into the act of sexual exploitation will be exposed.

This allegation of sexual assault was first made Dutta in 2008 against Patekar. A complaint was filed by Dutta in 2008 against the CINTAA but it was rejected because they lacked the jurisdiction to entertain such matters.

In 2013, Dutta raised the matter again during an interview but this time, it was openly rejected. However, the CINTAA apologized to Dutta in September 2018 and expressed their regrets for not addressing the matter in 2008 but added that the case cannot be reopened because it is more than 3 years.

Her allegations were backed by the Journalist Janice Sequeira who claimed to have witnessed the incidence. In addition to that, she declared that she was asked by Vivek Agnihotri to dance naked with Irrfan Khan during the making of the movie Chocolate.

Janice Sequeira disclosed that these two namely: Sunil Shetty and Irrfan Khan both resisted the order on her behalf during the episode. Vivek denied these accusations through a legal means as stated in the constitution and rather regarded it as an attempt by Dutta to get public sympathy.

However, the accused filmmaker has denied all the allegations, citing that Tanushree Dutta is working to obtain an unnecessary publicity while undermining his reputation through a court summon that was sent to her.

The Assistant Director of the film production company Chocolate, Sattuajit Gazmer has publicly refuted Dutta’s claims.

Tanushree has alleged series of attacks on her life which has been orchestrated by Nana Patekar. In one of the interviews she granted, she declared that the accused had called on the MNS party to destroy her vehicle. And that Patekar is behind all the abuse and retaliation that she is facing. This claim was supported by the popular choreographer Ganesh A.

A video released in 2008 which went viral on the social media captured a scene where Dutta’s car was bashed. This action of car bashing was committed by a journalist known as Pawan Bharadwaj who accepted to have committed the crime following an earlier brawl he had with Dutta’s group.

The MNS party had filed a defamation case against Dutta while she has also received two court summons from Vivek Agnihotri and Nana Patekar.

However, on the 6th of October 2018, an FIR was filed by Dutta at a Police Station in Oshiwara against Nana Patekar and his supporters.

 

Exit mobile version